{"id":7,"date":"2013-09-10T12:21:41","date_gmt":"2013-09-10T12:21:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/template-research\/?page_id=7"},"modified":"2024-01-16T16:34:34","modified_gmt":"2024-01-16T16:34:34","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"

Get the latest via Pubmed<\/a> | InfoPath<\/p>\n

Selected Publications<\/h2>\n

Liesefeld, H., et al. (2024).\u00a0 Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.\u00a0 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-023-02820-3<\/a><\/p>\n

Nartker, M., Firestone, C., Egeth, H., & Phillips, I. (2023). Six ways of failing to see (and why the differences matter). i-Perception<\/em>, 14<\/em>(5), 20416695231198762.<\/p>\n

Gaspelin, N., Lamy, D., Egeth, H. E., et al. (2023).\u00a0 The distractor positivity component and the inhibition of distracting stimuli. (2023).\u00a0 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn_a_02051<\/a><\/p>\n

Stilwell, B. T., Adams, O. T., Egeth, H. E., & Gaspelin, N. (2023). The role of salience in the suppression of distracting stimuli.\u00a0 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review<\/em>, 30, 2262-2271. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-023-02302-5<\/a><\/p>\n

Gaspelin, N., Egeth, H. E., & Luck, S. J. (2023). A Critique of the Attentional Window Account of Capture Failures. Journal of Cognition<\/em>, 6(1): 39, pp. 1\u20137. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/joc.270<\/a><\/p>\n

Hamblin-Frohman, Z., Chang, S., Egeth, H., & Becker, S. (2022).\u00a0 Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression of the guidance of attention.\u00a0 Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, <\/em>84, 1913-1924.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-022-02536-w<\/a>\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n

Stilwell, B.T., Egeth, H., & Gaspelin, N.\u00a0 (2022). Electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of highly salient distractors.\u00a0 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience<\/em>, 34,787-805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn_a_01827<\/u><\/a><\/p>\n

Chang, S., Niebur, E., & Egeth, H. (2021). Standing out in a small crowd: The role of display size in attracting attention. Visual Cognition<\/em>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13506285.2021.1918810<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Chang, S. & Egeth, H. E. (2020).\u00a0 Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?\u00a0 Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,<\/em> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-020-02207-8<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Chang, S., & Egeth, H. E. (2019).\u00a0 Enhancement and suppression flexibly guide attention.\u00a0 Psychological Science<\/em>, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797619878813<\/a><\/p>\n

Chang, S., & Egeth, H. E. (2019).\u00a0 Enhancement and suppression flexibly guide attention.\u00a0 Psychological Science<\/em>, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797619878813<\/a><\/p>\n

Jeck, D. M., Qin, M., Egeth, H., & Niebur, E. (2019).\u00a0 Unique objects attract attention even when faint.\u00a0 Vision Research, 160<\/em> (60-71).<\/p>\n

Chang, S. Cunningham, C. A., & Egeth, H. E. (2019).\u00a0 The power of negative thinking: Paradoxical but effective ignoring of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli with a spatial cue.\u00a0 Visual Cognition, 27<\/em> (3-4), 199-213.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H. (2018). Comment on Theeuwes\u2019s characterization of visual selection. Journal of Cognition, 1<\/em>(1), 26, DOI: http:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/joc.29<\/a><\/p>\n

Cunningham, C.A. & Egeth, H.E. (2017). The capture of attention by entirely irrelevant pictures of calorie-dense foods. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review<\/em>, doi: 10.3758\/s13423-017-1375-8. [Epub ahead of print]<\/p>\n

Jeck, D. M., Qin, M. Egeth, H., & Niebur, E. (2017). Attentive pointing in natural scenes correlates with other measures of attention. Vision Research<\/em>, 135, 54-64. pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Cunningham, C. A., & Egeth, H. E. (2016).\u00a0 Taming the white bear: Initial costs and eventual benefits of distractor inhibition.\u00a0 Psychological Science<\/em>, 27, 476-485.\u00a0pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Cunningham, C. A., Yassa, M. A. & Egeth, H. E. (2015).\u00a0 Massive memory revisited: Limitations on storage capacity for object details in visual long-term memory.\u00a0 Learning & Memory<\/em>, 22, 563-566.\u00a0pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Graves, T., & Egeth, H. E. (2015).\u00a0 When does feature search fail to protect against attentional capture?\u00a0 Visual Cognition<\/em>, 23, 1098-1123.\u00a0pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Moher, J., Lakshmanan, B., Egeth, H., & Ewen, J. (2014). Inhibition drives early feature-based attention. Psychological Science<\/em>, 25, 315-324. pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Moher, J., Ashinoff, B. K., & Egeth, H. E. (2013). Detection is unaffected by the deployment of focal attention. Frontiers in Psychology<\/em>. Doi: 10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00284.<\/p>\n

Moher, J. & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.<\/em> doi: 10.3758\/s13414-012-0358-0.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H. E. (2012). Some reflections on the processing of visual features. In J. Wolfe & L. Robertson (Eds.), From Perception to Consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman.<\/em> New York: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Lamy, D., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). Selective Attention. In A.F. Healy & R.W. Proctor (Eds.), Experimental Psychology<\/em>. Volume 4 in I.B. Weiner (Editor-in-Chief), Handbook of Psychology, New York: Wiley.<\/p>\n

Ewen, J.B., Moher, J.S., Xavier, P., Ryan, M., Lakshmanan, B. M. Crone, N. E., Denckla, M. B., Egeth, H., & Mahone, E. M. (2012). Multiple task interference is greater in children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology<\/em>, 37, 119-133.<\/p>\n

Moher, J., Lakshmanan, B. M., Egeth, H. E., & Ewen, J. B. (2012). Perseveration in attention: Inhibitory feature-based attentional sets automatically carry over to novel task contexts. Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)<\/em>, 46th Annual Conference. DOI: 10.1109\/CISS.2012.6310951.<\/p>\n

Moher, J., Abrams, J., Egeth, H. E., Yantis, S., & Stuphorn, V. (2011). Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review<\/em>, 18, 897-903.<\/p>\n

Moher, J. & Egeth, H.E. (2011). A mechanism for inhibition in visual search.Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)<\/em>, 45th Annual Conference. DOI: 10.1109\/CISS.2011.5766189.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H. E., Leonard, C. J., & Leber, A. B. (2010). Why salience is not enough: Reflections on top-down selection in vision. Acta Psychologica,<\/em> 135, 130-132.<\/p>\n

Palomares, M. & Egeth, H. (2010). How element visibility affects visual enumeration. Vision Research<\/em>, 50, 2000-2007.
\nPalomares, M., Ogbonna, C., Landau, B., & Egeth, H. (2009). Normal susceptibility to visual illusions in abnormal development: Evidence from Williams Syndrome. Perception, 38, 186-199.<\/em><\/p>\n

Egeth, H. E. (2009). Psychophysics of attention. In: L. R. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, volume 7, 1211-1216. Oxford: Academic Press.<\/p>\n

Palomares, M., Landau, B., & Egeth, H. (2009). Orientation perception in Williams Syndrome: Discrimination and integration. Brain and Cognition<\/em>, 70, 21-30.<\/p>\n

Proulx, M. J. & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast. Psychological Research<\/em>, 72, 106-113.<\/p>\n

Palomares, M., Landau, B., & Egeth, H. (2008). Visuospatial interpolation in typically developing children and in people with Williams Syndrome. Vision Research<\/em>, 2439-2450.<\/p>\n

Leonard, C. J. & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Attentional guidance in singleton search: An examination of top-down, bottom-up, and intertrial factors. Visual Cognition,<\/em>16, 1078-1091.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H. E., Leonard, C. J., and Palomares, M. (2008). The role of attention in subitizing: Is the magical number 1? Visual Cognition, 16, 463-473.<\/p>\n

Proulx, M.J. & Egeth, H.E. (2006). Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search. Psychological Bulletin & Review<\/em>, 13 (3), 524-529.<\/p>\n

Leber, A.B. & Egeth, H.E. (2006). It\u2019s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review<\/em>, 13 (1), 132-138.<\/p>\n

Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set. Visual<\/em> Cognition<\/em>, 14, 565-583.<\/p>\n

Lamy, D., Carmel, T., Egeth, H. E., Leber, A. B. (2006). Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search. Perception & Psychophysics<\/em>, 68 (6), 919-932.<\/p>\n

Lamy, D., Bar-Anan, Y., Egeth, H. E. (2006). Effects of top-down guidance and singleton priming on visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review<\/em>, 13 (2), 287-293.<\/p>\n

Serences, J., Shomstein, S., Leber, A. B., Golay, X., Egeth, H. E, & Yantis, S. (2005). Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychological Science<\/em>, 16 (2), 114-122.<\/p>\n

Lamy, D., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of stimulus-driven salience within feature search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>, 30 (6), 1019-1031.<\/p>\n

Connor, C.E., Egeth, H.E., & Yantis, S. (2004). Visual attention: Bottom-up versus top-down. Current Biology<\/em>, 14 (19), R850-R852.<\/p>\n

Lamy, D. & Egeth, H. (2002) Object-based selection : The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics<\/em>, 64, 52-66.<\/p>\n

Folk, C.L., Leber, A.B., & Egeth H.E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics<\/em>, 64, 741-753.<\/p>\n

Houts, P.S., Witmer, J.T., Egeth H.E., Loscalzo, M.J., & Zabora, J.T. (2001). Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions. Patient Education and Counseling<\/em>, 43, 231-242.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H.E., Folk, C.L., Leber, A.B., Nakama, T., & Hendel, S. (2001). Attentional capture in the temporal and spatial domains. In C.L. Folk & B.S. Gibson (Eds.) Advances in Psychology XXX – Attraction, distraction, and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. <\/em> Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H. (2000). Attention. In Encyclopedia of Psychology,<\/em> American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.<\/p>\n

Becker, L., & Egeth, H. (2000). Mixed reference frames for dynamic inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26,<\/em> 1147-1177.<\/p>\n

Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (3),<\/em> 661-676.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H. (1999). The cognitive impenetrability of visual perception: Old wine in a new bottle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (3),<\/em> 377.<\/p>\n

Moore, C.M., & Egeth, H. (1998). How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>, Vol 24, No. 4, 1296-1310.<\/p>\n

Ghirardelli, T.G., & Egeth, H. (1998). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in cross-dimensional texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 60 (5),<\/em> 826-838.<\/p>\n

Moore, C.M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under condition of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>, 23, 339-352.<\/p>\n

Grandison, T.D., Ghirardelli, T.G., & Egeth, H. (1997). Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink.Perception & Psychophysics, 59,<\/em> 266-274.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H.E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology<\/em>, 48, 269-297.<\/p>\n

Bacon, W.F., & Egeth, H.E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23,<\/em> 948-961.<\/p>\n

Gibson, B.S. & Egeth, H.E. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55 (3), 323-339.<\/p>\n

Bacon, W.F., & Egeth, H., (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics<\/em>, 55, 485-496.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H.E. (1993). Eyewitness testimony: An update. American Psychologist, vol. 58, 5,pp. 577-580.<\/p>\n

Kwak, H.-W., & Egeth, H.E. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 455-464.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H.E., & Mordkoff, J.T. (1991). Redundancy gain revisited: Evidence for parallel processing of separable dimensions. J. Pomerantz and G. Lockhead (Eds), The perception of structure (pp. 131-143). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.<\/p>\n

Kwak, H.-W., Dagenbach, D., & Egeth, H. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 473-480.<\/p>\n

Egeth, H.E., & Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,<\/em>17,550-559.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Get the latest via Pubmed | InfoPath Selected Publications Liesefeld, H., et al. (2024).\u00a0 Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.\u00a0 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-023-02820-3 Nartker, M., Firestone, C., Egeth, H., & Phillips, I. (2023). Six ways of failing to see (and why the differences matter). i-Perception, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":125,"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions\/125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.krieger.jhu.edu\/egeth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}